------------------------------------------------------------------------
            INFORMATION AND EVALUATION FORM FOR CHEMCONF '98


1. NAME                     DATE  

2. ADDRESS AT WORK


3. TITLE AT WORK (e.g. Professor, Teacher, Student, etc)

4. ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESS 

5. COURSES YOU TEACH 


STATISTICS

6. How many of the twelve papers did you read?                   

7. a. How many of the twelve papers did you look at?             

   b. What percentage of the papers you looked at did you read?  

8. TOTAL TIME SPENT READING PAPERS (in hours)                    

9. Average number of times you accessed discussion each day      

10. a. Total time you devoted to the discussion (in hours)       

    b. What percentage of the discussion did you read
       for the papers which you looked at?                      

11. Total Time Devoted to the Conference (in hours)              

EVALUATION

Evaluation - Scale 1 to 5 - 1 is Poor, 3 is Average and 5 is excellent

12. Overall evaluation of papers                                

13. Overall evaluation of discussion                           

14. Overall evaluation of Conference                           

15. What did you like most about the computer Conference?  

16. What did you like least about the computer Conference?  
 
17. What changes could be made to improve computer Conferences?
    (Schedule, Papers, Short Question Sessions, Discussion Sessions, etc.)


18. Compare this Conference with the usual one-site Conference.


19. Would you be interested in organizing and chairing a
    session for a future on-line conference?              

    If you are interested please indicate a topic for the session.
  

Please return this form to Thomas O'Haver (TO2@UMAIL.UMD.EDU)
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
by the end of May.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
------------------------------------------------------------------------